2008 School Annual Report
Phone | 4159 9296 | |
Fax | 4159 9083 | |
Email | admin@gooburruss.eq.edu.au | |
Website or Contact Person | www.gooburruss.eq.edu |
Introduction | |
This report provides information about | |

Future outlook | |
The school will be reduced to two classes in 2009 and a new teacher will be transferring in; so the aim of the school over the next twelve months will be to consolidate on our existing practices and examine strategies to improve the performances of individual students. Our curriculum plan is due to be completed by the end of 2009. It will need to be flexible by design in order to work successfully with two or three classes. We will be continuing our push into new areas of technology with the trial of an inter-active whiteboard in the upper school. | |
School Profile | |
Curriculum offerings | |
Our distinctive curriculum offerings An instrumental music program is offered in addition to the regular curriculum. | |
Extra curricula activities Camping program Choir Project Club Inter-School Sport | |
How computers are used to assist learningWe utilize computers within each of our classrooms in order for them to be seen as an everyday part of day to day schooling, and an integral part of the learning process. We have digital cameras, both still and video, as well as a data projector for classroom use. Funding has been set aside for the introduction of an inter-active whiteboard into the school in 2009. | |
Social climate | |
The school has a family feel, and all school functions are well supported. The school is very much a child centred environment. We rely upon families to help with working bees and P&C functions as well as in the classroom. Students run a project club which holds discos and raises funds for student activities. The school opinion survey highlighted that school-community relations have seen improvement over the last 12 months, and that 92% of parents feel their children are both happy and safe at our school. | |
Involving parents in their child’s education. | |
|
Expenditure on and teacher participation in professional development. | |||
Total funds expended on teacher professional development in 2008 was $923.91. The major professional development initiatives are as follows: Literacy training; Information and communication technologies training; and Leadership The involvement of teaching staff in professional development activities during 2008 was 90 %. | |||
Average staff attendance | |||
For permanent and temporary staff and school leaders the staff attendance rate was 95% in 2008. | |||
Proportion of staff retained from the previous school year. | |||
From the end of the 2007 school year, 54 % of staff were retained by the school for the entire 2008 school year. | |||
Student attendance | |
The average attendance rate as a percentage in 2008 was 94%. | |
National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) results - our reading, writing, spelling, grammar and punctuation, and numeracy results for the Years 3, 5, 7 and 9. |
Domain | Measures | Yr 3 | Yr 5 | Yr 7 | |
Average score for the school | 304.4 | 433.1 | 520.4 | ||
Average score for | 371.1 | 466.1 | 528.1 | ||
For the school the percentage of students at or above the national minimum standard. | 2008 | 70 % | 80 % | 100 % | |
Writing | Average score for the school | 376.2 | 439.5 | 482.1 | |
Average score for | 391.8 | 468.9 | 522.7 | ||
For the school the percentage of students at or above the national minimum standard. | 2008 | 87.5 % | 80 % | 90 % | |
Spelling | Average score for the school | 312.6 | 413 | 498.5 | |
Average score for | 366.7 | 462.0 | 528.0 | ||
For the school the percentage of students at or above the national minimum standard. | 2008 | 70 % | 66.7 % | 80 % | |
Grammar and Punctuation | Average score for the school | 289.1 | 419.6 | 499.2 | |
Average score for | 370.4 | 476.6 | 518.0 | ||
For the school the percentage of students at or above the national minimum standard. | 2008 | 60 % | 83.3 % | 100 % | |
Numeracy | Average score for the school | 307.4 | 432.3 | 540.8 | |
Average score for | 367.9 | 458.2 | 539.0 | ||
For the school the percentage of students at or above the national minimum standard. | 2008 | 77.8 % | 75 % | 100 % | |
Results in the Year 2 Diagnostic Net |
| |
Percentage of students not requiring additional support | ||
75% |
| |
Writing | 75% |
|
Number | 100% |
|
Value added | |
In the second semester of 2008 the school utilised an available staffing allocation to employ an intervention teacher on the basis of one day per week. This time was used in a number of ways. It was used to; - identify specific skill deficiencies in the targeted student population, - plan intervention programs, - manage and coordinate a teacher aide intervention service. - provide students with intervention, - track improvements in student performance. | |
Parent, student and teacher satisfaction with the school | |
As part of our goal of continuous improvement, parents, students and teachers are surveyed annually in order to determine their level of satisfaction with the school’s operations and performance. In 2008; Our parent opinion survey indicated that parents were more satisfied than last year in the following areas; - Curriculum - School climate - School-community relations and - Resourcing Our student survey demonstrated improvement in satisfaction ratings relating to; the way they use computer technology for learning, with how easy it is to access the internet for learning and, how well their teacher explained work clearly Staff satisfaction improved across the performance areas of; - Physical work environment - Relationships - School operations - Work roles - Work value and recognition | |